Skip to content

Riski time…

I’m spending most of my time working on Riski... so no Shopyielding…

Riski is a open source project to draw together many resources which relate to the regulation of financial markets and products. Riski was developed to assist members of Congress and their staffs as they create new law to regulate financial markets. Financial markets are complex and having a place where information is gathered and shared is critical for our democracy.

Riski aggregates information about financial markets practice, product information and regulation.

We welcome contributions from market participants, financial technology experts, regulators, legislators, academics and the media.

We encourage you to add or edit content to the site if you are knowledgeable.

Please include citations and/or references for all content where possible.

See you at Riski!

Open sourcy…

from Wall Street and Tech…

RBC Capital Markets Taps Open Source Platform for Fixed Income Applications

Invetsment bank RBC Capital Markets leverages open source development platform Eclipse to integrate multiple fixed income applications through a single user interface.
By Ivy Schmerken
June 17, 2009

With the proliferation of multiple applications on the desktop for each fixed-income product, it can be a challenge for traders at RBC Capital Markets to seamlessly work across a portfolio. “We had tons of applications on the desktop,” relates Edwin Park, the investment bank’s head of the fixed-income core technology. “People try to trade multiple products in the same portfolio but it becomes difficult to open up all the applications.”

To provide its fixed-income traders with a more integrated user experience, RBC has turned to Eclipse, an open source integrated development environment, as the basis for its global fixed-income trading applications. The ongoing project, called Helios, is targeted at bringing front-office trading applications under a single user interface.

(Continued)

The New Improved 2009 Floaters

So much is made of the special abilities of Wall Street to innovate new ways to flow capital to various entities…

But is all innovation good? Or is some of it just new ways for Wall Street underwriters to package securities and make fees?

The Wall Street Journal reports today on the New Improved 2009 Floaters…

~~~~ “Wall Street firms including Citigroup Inc., Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Morgan Stanley, Co. have introduced a new security for the damaged municipal-bond market, meant to fill the role once played by securities that lost investor confidence in the peak of the market panic.

Their effort is part of Wall Street’s search for new ways to create business after a crippling nine months of crisis and government intervention. Much like auction-rate, variable-rate, and corporate floating-rate debt, the new tax-free “Windows” or “X-tender” securities offer municipalities the ability to borrow for the long term while paying only short-term interest rates.

(Continued)

You want transparency? Tag it…

One of the easist ways to create transparency in financial markets is to break documents or processes into pieces and tag them… this is the approach that FIX, the standard for electronic trading of securities takes and  XBRL does for financial reporting...

Some have suggested this approach for asset backed securities… the products which lie at the heart of the financial crisis… that would immediately remove the opacity of these securities which are not structured in standardized ways…

Having been involved in slowly migrating an industry to a new approach I know that adoption generally happens when new processes are devloped or new infrastructure is built. Because we are now engaged in creating new frameworks for regulatory oversight it is imperative that we adopt as many standardized reporting processes as possible…

The SEC had an public seminar yesterday for those who build apps that use issuer information… this should just be the beginning of the use of XBRL at the Commission… credit ratings, mutual fund reporting, asset backed securities… looking forward to new applications…

SEC Public Seminar on New Interactive Data Reporting Requirements
Wednesday, June 10, 2009 

Press Release
Panel 1 Slides
Panel 2 Slides
Webcast Archives
***************

Too big to fail software

Reblogged from Finextra…

Microsoft kills off Money

In the face of increasing competition from banks, brokerage firms and dedicated Web sites, Microsoft is scrapping its Money personal finance management software.
The firm says it will stop selling the software, which was first introduced in 1991, on 30 June. The move comes after Microsoft stopped selling it in stores last year, offering it only as a download.

Microsoft Money Plus, which was available in four versions costing between $19.99 and $69.99, enabled users to keep track of their finances, pay bills and manage shares and taxes.

Some functions of the software will continue to work indefinitely but online services - such as stock quotes, e-banking and bill-pay - will no longer be available after January 2011.

In a statement on its Web site, Microsoft says: “With banks, brokerage firms and Web sites now providing a range of options for managing personal finances, the consumer need for Microsoft Money Plus has changed.”

Microsoft’s decision to quit the market comes after years struggling to compete with market leader Intuit. Recently it has also faced competition from online outfits such as Mint and Wesabe.

Finextra verdict: Desktop market leader Intuit will be the initial beneficiary in the short-term. However, Microsoft’s bail-out signals a shift in consumer sentiment, and a rejection of the bloated all-singing, all-dancing desktop model. In its place will come a selection of stripped-down Web 2.0 apps and widgets, more suited to the always-on mobile lifestyle of tomorrow. A similar shift will ultimately emerge in banking, as the hulking monoliths of the financial services industry are left behind and consumers select what they need from a mash up of different specialist providers existing at the periphery.

Emma’s getting stronger…

MSRB NOTICE 2009-31 (JUNE 10, 2009)

MSRB RECEIVES APPROVAL TO ACCEPT FILINGS OF  VOLUNTARY CONTINUING DISCLOSURES TO THE MSRB’S ELECTRONIC MUNICIPAL MARKET ACCESS (EMMA) SYSTEM

On June 3, 2009, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the “MSRB”) received approval from the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) for the Electronic Municipal Market Access system (“EMMA”) to accept, and to make publicly available on the EMMA web portal, voluntary electronic submissions by issuers, obligated persons and their agents, of continuing disclosure documents provided other than in connection with Exchange Act Rule 15c2-12. EMMA’s continuing disclosure service will begin accepting such voluntary continuing disclosures effective July 1, 2009. Such voluntary continuing disclosures will be in addition to continuing disclosure documents described in Exchange Act Rule 15c2-12 and other disclosure documents specified in continuing disclosure undertakings, but not specifically described in Rule 15c2-12, that are currently accepted by the pilot phase of the EMMA continuing disclosure service.

(Continued)

Regulating credit default swaps

Regulating Credit Default Swaps Preview For Press
I’ll be blogging the PRMIA event on the regulation of credit default swaps… here is an excellent presentation from the moderator of the event, Gary Kopff…
The panel includes Joseph Mason from Louisiana State University, Ann Rutledge from RR Consulting, Tim Ryan of SIFMA, Michael Greenberger from University of Maryland Law School, Kevin McPartland of Tabb Group, and is moderated by Gary Kopff of Everest Management.

More to come…

Desperate kingdom of liquidity

Morgan Stanley has launched a new single dealer, over the counter platform for institutional users… Morgan Stanley Matrix.

Matrix is an elegant system and looks like it is designed to compete in certain product classes against Barclay’s Barx… and multi-dealer platforms like Tradeweb for interest rate swaps… or RFQ-hub for more exotic products…

Users can get Morgan Stanley economic analysis, visualization tools and streaming data … for some products there are executable prices and some are “request for quote” where you send a message to the trading desk to provide you with a current bid or offer…

The Matrix platform joins the parade of single-dealer and multi-dealer platforms that float in the great over-the-counter ether…

I had a nice conversation yesterday with the government relations person for one of the major exchanges in the “overflow” room at the House Financial Services Committee hearing about the differences between the regulatory oversight of exchanges and the OTC markets… we exchanged observations as we listened to members of Congress probe the witnesses about derivatives trading and clearing.

My hope is that efforts to reform the financial system will include more trueing up of the differences between these two areas. Traditionally the argument has been that OTC markets need minimal oversight because only “institutional investors” participate in those markets. But the cruel truth is that many of those “sophisticated” investors are representing thousands of small investors on an aggregated basis. And the darkness of those markets have punished investors large and small.

The epic size of the government bailouts suggests that the darkness of unregulated markets concentrated risk to such a degree that only the government had the means to backstop and guarantee failing market participants. Would empowering a “systemic regulator” make the concentrated risks of the OTC markets more manageable? Or are other approaches to regulating Matrix, Barx, Tradeweb and all their OTC brethern a more sensible approach?

Regulating derivatives

I attended the House Committee on Financial Services Capital Markets Subcommittee hearing today… the topic was the oversight of derivatives… lots of discussion about the failure of AIG and what happened there too…

It is more clear to me than before that legislators need systems to share information to effectively  legislate regulation for financial markets … yes tools like Riski… especially like Riski

Derivatives are an especially complex area because there is minimal standardization in the nomenclature, trading practices, counterparty relationships, clearing practices and current oversight…

There are many types of derivatives… and some like interest rate swaps are pretty simple and have liquid markets… for many of the Congressmen on the Subcommittee having access to basic concepts about the markets, their size and the levels of concentration, collateral and margining would be good… they could more effectively legislate if some light was shed on product types and purposes…

Chairman Kanjorski asked the men testifying to pledge to help untangle this issue… and they agreed which is very good…  with Riski many experts in the derivatives space can participate… coming up Chairman… Riski for derivatives

Vigilante silencioso

From Chicago Public Radio…

This American Life

~~~~ Since Congress hasn’t held 1930’s-style hearings into the causes of the financial crisis, we stage one of our own.  The subject? The regulators and watchdogs who were supposed to be overseeing the banks and the finance industry—to make sure things wouldn’t blow up like they have.  Clearly something went wrong. Today we pound a gavel and ask: where were the watchmen?

You can check out our other shows on the economy here. Today’s show is a co-production with NPR News, part of our Planet Money project.  The Planet Money blog and thrice-weekly podcast is at www.npr.org/money.

Prologue.Host Ira Glass talks with Michael Perrino, a law professor at St Johns University School of Law in New York, who’s writing a book about Ferdinand Pecora called The Hellhound of Wall Street.  Pecora was the lead attorney in the Senate Banking Committee hearings in the 1930s looking into wrongdoing in the banking industry.  When he got the job, he turned the hearings from an unimportant and not terrible useful exercise into a real investigation into Wall Street and the causes of the 1929 stock market collapse.  It spurred Congress to pass landmark reforms regulating Wall Street. Ira and Perrino talk about whether these kinds of hearings could or should happen today. (9 minutes)

Act One. Investigation Report #1.

Planet Money reporter Chana Joffe-Walt asks a simple question: who was the federal regulator who was supposed to be regulating AIG?  The answer turns out to be far from simple. (21 minutes)

Act Two. Investigation Report #2.

Alex Blumberg and NPR correspondent (and “Planet Money” reporter) Dave Kestenbaum examine what went wrong with the credit ratings agencies.  When all these financial instruments that brought down our economy—the mortgage backed securities, the derivatives—were originally issued, the rating agencies (Standard and Poors, Moody’s and Fitch) gave many of these things their top rating of triple-A. Because of the great ratings, trillions were invested. And then the ratings turned out to be wrong. What happened? (24 minutes).~~~~